For the first time in the second half, I'll post the Pythagorean standings. These go by overall record, combining the first and second half.
.
Team
W
L
RS
RA
pW
pL
Difference
pW%
.
San Jose
49
35
449
387
48
36
1
0.56756780829969
.
Modesto
45
39
438
413
44
40
1
0.52686198925591
.
Visalia
45
39
415
418
42
42
3
0.49670471533761
.
Bakersfield
39
45
371
416
38
46
1
0.44781467424979
.
Stockton
37
47
417
468
38
46
-1
0.44740795296184
San Jose has struggled to start the second half, but many of their losses are tight games, so their expected record is still very similar to what it was at the end of the first half. Modesto and Visalia are still running neck and neck, but Modesto has improved on their run differential in the second half while Visalia is still in the same range. Bakersfield has been the hottest team in the league to start this half, but they still haven't put much distance between themselves and Stockton in the overall standings.
.
Team
W
L
RS
RA
pW
pL
Difference
pW%
.
Lake Elsinore
52
32
455
368
50
34
2
0.59588603433967
.
RanchoCucamonga
47
37
442
392
47
37
0
0.55470214962289
.
High Desert
45
39
501
459
45
39
0
0.53997134208381
.
Inland Empire
33
51
383
433
37
47
-4
0.44409818487989
.
Lancaster
28
56
384
501
32
52
-4
0.38066813672479
It remains to be seen if this will be an issue for the entire second half, but Lake Elsinore's offense hasn't been as productive after the Drew Cumberland and Blake Tekotte promotions, and as a result, the expected record has taken a hit. Their slow start has allowed RanchoCucamonga and High Desert to gain some ground. Those two teams are tied, but one difference from the first half is the Quakes passed High Desert in expected record. Inland Empire and Lancaster still have a lot of work to do.
I'm always looking for new links to add. If you have anything I should consider, particularly in the newspaper and prospect sections, contact me. I'd like to have a newspaper that covers every team and a prospect site that focuses on each ML team with an affiliate in the California League.
No comments:
Post a Comment